No. 22-840
K. M., Individually and on Behalf of M. M. and S. M., et al. v. Eric L. Adams, Mayor of the City of New York, et al.
Tags: administrative-exhaustion administrative-remedies affirmative-defense claim-processing-rule disability-education idea-statute individuals-with-disabilities-education-act judicial-challenge jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirement waiver
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether IDEA exhaustion requirement is jurisdictional or a claim-processing rule
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (‘IDEA”) requires, with certain exceptions, the exhaustion of administrative remedies before a judicial challenge under the Act may be brought. Is this exhaustion requirement jurisdictional, or rather, is it a claim-processing rule that must be raised as an affirmative defense that may be waived?
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-05
Reply of petitioners K. M., Individually and on behalf of M. M. and S. M. filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-22
Letter from Middletown Township Public Schools, West Orange Public Schools, Cherry Hill Public Schools and Readington Township Public Schools received.
2023-05-22
Brief of respondents Ashford Board of Education, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-05-22
Brief of respondent Austin Independent School District in opposition filed.
2023-05-22
Brief of respondents Eric L. Adams, David C. Banks, New York City Department of Education in opposition filed.
2023-05-22
Brief of respondent New York State Department of Education in opposition filed.
2023-04-20
Response Requested. (Due May 22, 2023)
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-03
Waiver of right of respondents Addison Central School District, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-31
Supplemental brief of petitioners K. M., Individually and on Behalf of M. M. and S. M., et al. filed.
2023-03-31
Waiver of right of respondents Ashford Board of Education, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Pennsylvania Department of Education to respond filed.
2023-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent New York State Department of Education to respond filed.
2023-03-08
Waiver of right of respondents Eric L. Adams, David C. Banks, New York City Department of Education to respond filed.
2023-03-07
Waiver of right of respondents Middletown Township Public Schools, West Orange Public Schools, Cherry Hill Public Schools and Readington Township Public Schools to respond filed.
2023-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Austin Independent School District to respond filed.
2023-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2023)
2022-11-30
Application (22A464) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 27, 2023.
2022-11-22
Application (22A464) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 29, 2022 to February 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Addison Central School District, et al.
Bryce L. Friedman — Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Respondent
Bryce L. Friedman — Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Respondent
Ashford Board of Education, et al.
Proloy Kumar Das — FordHarrison LLP, Respondent
Proloy Kumar Das — FordHarrison LLP, Respondent
Austin Independent School District
Jonathan Griffin Brush — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent
Jonathan Griffin Brush — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent
Amy Dawn Demmler — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent
Amy Dawn Demmler — Rogers, Morris & Grover, L.L.P., Respondent
Branford Board of Education, North Haven Board of Education, et al
Linda Louise Yoder — Shipman & Goodwin, Respondent
Linda Louise Yoder — Shipman & Goodwin, Respondent
Eric L. Adams, David C. Banks, New York City Department of Education
Diana Lawless — Respondent
Diana Lawless — Respondent
Richard Paul Dearing — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Richard Paul Dearing — New York City Law Department, Respondent
K. M., Individually and on Behalf of M. M. and S. M., et al.
Rory J. Bellantoni — Brain Injury Rights Group, Ltd., Petitioner
Rory J. Bellantoni — Brain Injury Rights Group, Ltd., Petitioner
K.M., Individually and on behalf of M.M. and S.M.
Melissa Arbus Sherry — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner
Melissa Arbus Sherry — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner
Lackawanna City School District and Middletown City School District
Eric Del Pozo — Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Respondent
Eric Del Pozo — Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Respondent
Middletown Township Public Schools, West Orange Public Schools, Cherry Hill Public Schools and Readington Township Public Schools
Eric Labes Harrison — Methfessel & Werbel, PC, Respondent
Eric Labes Harrison — Methfessel & Werbel, PC, Respondent
New York State Department of Education
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Pennsylvania Department of Education
Michael John Scarinci — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent
Michael John Scarinci — Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, Respondent