No. 22-851

United States v. Julian Garcon

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-08
Status: Dismissed
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-history criminal-history-points criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines jurisdiction safety-valve sentencing sentencing-relief statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the defendant satisfies the prerequisites for 'safety-valve' sentencing relief under 18 U.S.C. 3553(f)(1)

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, in order for a defendant to satisfy the prerequisite for “safety-valve” sentencing relief in 18 U.S.C. 3553(f)(1), a court must find that the defendant does not have more than 4 criminal history points (excluding any criminal history points resulting from a 1-point offense); does not have a prior 3-point offense; and does not have a prior 2-point violent offense. (1)

Docket Entries

2023-10-17
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2023-10-16
Joint stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.1 filed.
2023-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-02
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Julian Garcon.
2023-08-02
Memorandum of respondent Julian Garcon filed.
2023-06-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 4, 2023.
2023-06-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2023 to August 4, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 5, 2023.
2023-05-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 5, 2023 to July 5, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-05-04
Response Requested. (Due June 5, 2023)
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-03-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2023)

Attorneys

Julian Garcon
Tracy M. DreispulFederal Public Defender's Office, SD of Fla., Respondent
Tracy M. DreispulFederal Public Defender's Office, SD of Fla., Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Petitioner
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Petitioner