No. 22-864

Ohio v. D. R.

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2023-03-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1) Experienced Counsel
Tags: court-discretion discretionary-hearings due-process fourteenth-amendment juvenile-offenders sex-offenders statutory-obligations
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause entitle juvenile sex offenders to hearings at which courts have discretion to lift statutorily mandated obligations?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause entitle juvenile sex offenders to hearings at which courts have discretion to lift statutorily mandated obligations?

Docket Entries

2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-22
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2023-05-15
2023-05-09
2023-04-06
2023-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 10, 2023.
2023-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 10, 2023 to May 10, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-07

Attorneys

D.R.
Jessica Rafal MossHamilton County Public Defender's Office, Respondent
Jessica Rafal MossHamilton County Public Defender's Office, Respondent
Stuart BannerUCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Respondent
Stuart BannerUCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Respondent
Ohio
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Petitioner
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Petitioner
Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association
Steven L. TaylorOhio Prosecuting Attys. Assn., Amicus
Steven L. TaylorOhio Prosecuting Attys. Assn., Amicus