Whether respondents acted in a conspiracy to deprive the appellant of liberty and property without due process

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether respondents Milton F. Fitch, Jr., Ownes Chads, E., Calvin Woodard, Jr., Robert A. Evans, Roland Loftin, Donald W. Stephen, Colon Willoughby, Cynthia Thornton and Thomas A. Asbell, li, acted in a conspiracy to deprive the appellant of liberty and property without due process of law in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. ii PROCEEDINGS AND RELATED CASES Armstrong v. North Carolina, et al; No. 5:12-cv-00805-BO United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Western (Raleigh) Division. On July 5, 2022, Appellant seeks leave to appeal a district court order entered on March 29, 2013; Armstrong vs. Calvin L. Woodard, et al. Armstrong v. North Carolina, et al; No. 21-192. United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. judgment entered July 8, 2022. Rule 26.1: Disclosure statements: There is no parent or publicly held company owing 10% or more of the corporate stock. TABLE OF CONTENT Questions presented on... Disclosure statement Table Of Content «0.00... Opinion + Judicial statement... ccs constitutional and statutory provision Statement Of the CaS... Reason for granting petition... LO COMCIUSION nee