No. 22-876

Daniel L. Pohle v. Michael Pence, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-conspiracy due-process international-treaty presidential-powers supremacy-clause treaty-violation united-nations-convention
Key Terms:
Environmental Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-05-11
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the President is bound by the Supremacy Clause to seek injunction against a state governor violating the CISG

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , ' ; 1. Whether the President of the United States is ; bound by the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution to seek injunction against a Governor of ‘ ; a state who provides a venue for an International Corporation to litigate a sales contract dispute _ against a United States Corporation in violation of . OS the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the : International Sale of Goods. (CISG) . 2. Whether the knowing and willful noncompliance with a ratified United States Treaty by a President of the United States and other persons represents a Criminal Conspiracy against the United States of America under 18 -U.S. Code -371 or : : Treason under 18 -U.S. Code 2381. . 3. Whether the knowing and willful noncompliance with a ratified United States Treaty by a President of the United States and other persons resulting in the blocking of Otter Creek Trading Co ; Inc and Daniel L. Pohle’s Constitutional Right to. Due Process in a court with proper jurisdiction ; represents a Criminal Conspiracy to Violate the Constitutional Rights of another person under 18 U. S. Code 241. a 4, Whether the Rooker -Feldman Doctrine can be ’ constitutional if it has been used as a tool of fraud by i the United States Department of Justice and the ' State of Indiana to moot the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale ; , of Goods (CISG) signed by the United States of » America and ninety-four other nations. \ a4 it

Docket Entries

2023-05-15
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent Michael R. Pence to respond filed.
2023-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2023)
2022-11-02
Application (22A380) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until January 20, 2023.
2022-10-31
Application (22A380) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 21, 2022 to January 20, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.

Attorneys

Daniel L. Pohle
Daniel L. Pohle — Petitioner
Daniel L. Pohle — Petitioner
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Michael R. Pence
Thomas M. FisherOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Thomas M. FisherOffice of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent