Whether the Petitioner's brother Alexander Basile being murdered 6-3-22, the horrific beating and skewering of his body by unknown Secret Service, MI5 (Boris Johnson immediately retiring and Her Majesty the Queen apparently committing suicide) and Santa Monica Police Department covering up with false police reports contradicting 911 calls, all parties in violation of previously applied Federal Statutes with RICO in 'the RICO Complaint' already reported to all agencies

No question identified. : QUESTION Whether the Petitioner’s brother Alexander Basile being murdered 6-3-22, the horrific beating and skewering of his body by unknown Secret Service, MI5 (Boris Johnson immediately retiring and Her Majesty the Queen apparently committing suicide) and Santa Monica Police Department covering up with false police reports contradicting 911 calls, all parties in violation of previously applied Federal Statutes with RICO in “the RICO Complaint” already reported to all agencies Pentagon desk at The White House, FBI Anti-Terror, Sara Lichterman —CIA c/o National Counter Terrorism Center due to the murder occurring in identical “threat then attack” pattern that these studio used before Metrolink terror as threat mechanism already before this court with great detail entitles Petitioner to an immediate award for summary judgment as to the “Defendants to the Copyright Claims” and related Southwest Airlines Defendants, outlined to have conspired to attack Petitioner and his family to evade copyright conviction several times now committing murder in lieu of paying Petitioner’s damages increasing due to wrongful death, JF the lower courts are refusing to provide immediate remedy in violation of F.R.C.P. 60(b) and 60(d), or to recuse or disqualify in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 455(a), one particular judge of the Central District Court refusing to allow for a different impartial judge to review the damage caused by his initial failure to provide determination of only a magistrate’s order affirmed with a crude assessment of circumstances in error repeatedly by The Ninth Circuit. ii RESPONDENTS: (1) The Los Angeles Film School, LLC dba The Los Angeles Film School (listed on cover) (2) Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (3) Scott Free, LLC. (4) Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc. (5) Sony Pictures Television, Inc. (6) Kripke Enterprises (7) Amblin Entertainment, Inc. ; (8) NBCUniversal Media, LLC (NBCUniversal) ~ (9) Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc. (10) Legend Pictures, LLC. (Legendary Pictures), (11) Lilly Wachowski (Andrew Wachowski), (12) Lana Wachowski (13) Ehm Productions , Inc. (TMZ) (14) Jonathon Nolan (15) Christopher Nolan (16) Onza Partners SL, Onza Entertainment (17) RIO Properties, LLC (“RIO All Suites Hotel Casino Caesars Entertainment Corporation) (18) Thorndal, Armstrong, Delk, Balkenbush & Eisinger (19) Southwest Airlines, Co. (20) Robert A. Leark, P.H.D. (21) Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (22) Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles (23) U.S. District Court ~ Central District of California of Western Division (24) The Ninth Court of Appeals (25) The Federal Bureau of Investigation (26) JAMS, Inc. (27) Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp LLP iii (28) Ford Harrison, LLP (29) City of Oxnard (Oxnard Police Department) (30) City of Beverly Hills (Beverly Hills Police Department) ; (31) Michelle Obama (32) Blake Lively (33) Nancy Pelosi (California’s 12th Congressional District) (34) Gold Coast Cab Company (35) Alston & Bird, LLP.