No. 22-891

John Earl Erickson, et ux. v. Vanessa Power, et al.

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2023-03-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-proceedings client-concealment due-process false-pleadings foreclosure-action forged-documents fraud-on-court fraud-on-the-court legal-misrepresentation relief-from-judgments summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-05-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does fraud on the court committed by officers of the court in civil proceedings violate due process requiring relief from judgments fraudulently procured on false pleadings supported by forged documents submitted by opposing counsel?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW |. Does fraud on the court committed by officers of the court in civil proceedings violate due process requiring relief from judgments fraudulently procured on false pleadings supported by forged documents submitted by opposing counsel? Il. Were Petitioners’ Due Process Rights violated in the state court proceedings when they were denied the remedy of relief from the fraudulently procured judgment by the Superior Court’s sua sponte conversion of Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss to a Motion for Summary Judgment without notice or opportunity to be heard?

Docket Entries

2023-05-22
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-03-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
2023-01-11
Application (22A625) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 11, 2023.
2023-01-06
Application (22A625) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 10, 2023 to March 11, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

John Earl Erickson, et al.
Wendy Alison Nora — Petitioner
Wendy Alison Nora — Petitioner