No. 22-894
Andrew Meisner, Oakland County Treasurer, et al. v. Marion Sinclair
Tags: constitutional-law due-process equitable-title foreclosure municipal-government property-rights property-tax surplus-proceeds takings takings-clause tax-delinquency tax-foreclosure
Key Terms:
Takings DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Takings DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than the tax delinquency
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented is substantively the same one this Court is already considering in Tyler v. Hennepin County, No. 22-166: 1. Whether foreclosing on a home for the nonpayment of taxes constitutes a violation of the federal Takings Clause whenever the home is worth more than the tax delinquency.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-07
Brief of respondent Marion Sinclair in opposition filed.
2023-05-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 24, 2023.
2023-05-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 25, 2023 to July 24, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-25
Response Requested. (Due May 25, 2023)
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent Marion Sinclair to respond filed.
2023-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)
Attorneys
Andrew Meisner, et al.
John J. Bursch — Bursch Law PLLC, Petitioner
John J. Bursch — Bursch Law PLLC, Petitioner
Marion Sinclair
Mark Louis McAlpine — McAlpine PC, Respondent
Mark Louis McAlpine — McAlpine PC, Respondent