No. 22-921

Dan Cherner v. Westchester Jewish Community Services, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights court-appointed court-immunity custody-proceeding due-process family-court forensic-evaluator judicial-immunity qualified-immunity state-action state-actor
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Are respondents state actors?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Are respondents, who were appointed as | forensic evaluator in a custody proceeding by the Family Court of the State of New York, by court order which directed specific actions, including observing the children with each parent, state actors ? 2. Are respondents, as a court-appointed forensic evaluator, entitled to absolute immunity ? , 3. Are respondents, as a court-appointed forensic evaluator, entitled to quasi-judicial . immunity ? 4. Are respondents, as a court-appointed ' forensic evaluator, entitled to qualified immunity ? 5. Are respondents, as a court-appointed forensic evaluator, entitled to any type of immunity ? ; 6. May respondents, as a court-appointed forensic evaluator, disobey, flout, and violate a court order issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, under a cloak of immunity ? i }

Docket Entries

2023-07-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED.
2023-06-22
2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-03-17

Attorneys

Dan Cherner
Dan ChernerThe Cherner Firm, Petitioner
Dan ChernerThe Cherner Firm, Petitioner