Whether inexcusable error by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia to issue an unclear Order with judicial errors that is confusing to which parties the order is for

QUESTION PRESENTED : ; Whether inexcusable error by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia to issue an Order that was unclear with judicial errors that is confusing to which parties the order is for, referencing petitioner instead of the defendant of the case. The Order for Summary Affirmance referencing the petitioner’s claims when the petitioner never requested it, the petitioner’s motion was for opposition to Summary Affirmance requested by the defendant. The Order by US. Court of : Appeals for the District Court of Columbia is confusing and inexcusable judicial error. The inexcusable judicial ; error of U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia is a judicial mistake and created a confusion of the Order to decipher the correct judgement of US. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia ruling for Summary Affirmance for the petitioner when the motion from the petitioner from the U.S. Court of Appeals was opposition to Summary Affirmance. The U.S. Court of Appeals made an error and also applied the law incorrectly by ignoring the fact the U.S. District Court dismissing the case without prejudice incorrectly on the time frame to file EEOC claims, because less than 90 days was passed since the ‘right to sue letter’ was issued on February 14, 2022 by EEOC. According to Title VII, the American Disability : Act, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, a person aggrieved under Title VII who seeks to file a civil action must do so within ninety days from receipt of ; the EEOC right-to-sue notice, the original case was ii QUESTION PRESENTED -— Continued filed in the correct time frame and disregard the petitioner’s rights under EEOC rule to file discrimination lawsuit against the petitioner’s employer. The petitioner filed the first lawsuit within the 90 days in Superior Court for the District of Columbia (Case #2020 CA 002388 B) on May 1, 2020 at 1:22:16 PM, of the ‘Right to Sue Letter’ mailed on February 14, 2020, after 90 days would been after May 14, 2020. The U.S. Court of Appeals accepted the error of the U.S. District Court for the District Court of Columbia when it should have , overturned the U.S. District Court error in judgment. The petitioner dismissed the first case without prejudice and the right to remand this case fall under the US. District Court jurisdiction of dismiss without prejudice. The Judicial System implemented dismiss with, out prejudice as an avenue for continuous of First Amendment Right to Petition before the Court, and to deny continuation of this case, the law was applied incorrectly. The U.S. Court of Appeals denied petitioner Right to Petition and due process because the case was properly filed and dismissed without prejudice, the inexcusable neglect of the U.S. Court of Appeals diminishing the guiding foundation for the Judicial System, to obstruct that would derail the guiding principles of foundation the Judicial System was built on. The US. Court of Appeals stated the petitioner forfeited all his claims by failing to raise any of them in opposition motion for Summary Affirmance, which is completely an error in judicial judgement. All the claims under Title VII and 42 U.S.C 1985(3) and 1986 was well iii QUESTION PRESENTED Continued documented on opposition to Summary Affirmance, ignoring that fact is a judicial error, mistake and inexcusable neglect by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia. This petition is submitted to the Supreme Court as a result of the US. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia applied the Law Incorrectly, denial of First Amendment Right to Petition, Error, Mistake, Inexcusable Neglect, denied : Private Right of Action and Public Interest of U.S. Court of Appeals and hold Booz Allen Hamilton accountable for violation of Human Rights, Constitutional and Federal Laws and prevent Booz Allen Hamilton in the future from oppressing and setting people up