No. 22-929

BYD Motors Inc. v. Soderholm Sales and Leasing, Inc.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-24
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-panel appellate-review de-novo-review district-court hawaii-statute judicial-review memorandum-disposition salve-regina-college-v-russell standard-of-review statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Memorandum disposition, where the majority of the split appellate panel affirmed the district court's appealed decision without having conducted a de novo review of the district court's interpretation of the Hawaii statute at issue, conflicts with Salve Regina College v. Russell

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Memorandum disposition, where the majority of the split appellate panel affirmed the district court’s appealed decision without having conducted a de novo review of the district court’s interpretation of the Hawaii statute at issue, conflicts with Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U.S. 225, 1118. Ct. 1217, 113 L. Ed. 2d 190 (1991).

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-25
Stipulation to withdraw the petition submitted. (Received June 1, 2023)
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-03
2023-04-24
2023-03-22

Attorneys

BYD Motors Inc.
Christian Keola AdamsAdams Krek LLP, Petitioner
Christian Keola AdamsAdams Krek LLP, Petitioner
Soderholm Sales and Leasing, Inc.
Jeffrey Philip MillerMiller Shea, LLLP, Respondent
Jeffrey Philip MillerMiller Shea, LLLP, Respondent