No. 22-947
Tyler G. Williams v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: armed-career-criminal-act constitutional-requirements criminal-sentencing due-process jury-trial prior-convictions proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant's prior convictions were 'committed on occasions different from one another'
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Constitution requires an indictment, jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt to find that a defendant’s prior convictions were “committed on occasions different from one another,” as is necessary to impose an enhanced sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1).
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2023)
2023-01-19
Application (22A648) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until March 25, 2023.
2023-01-13
Application (22A648) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 24, 2023 to March 25, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Tyler G. Williams
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent