Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Diana Hagen, Justice, Supreme Court of Utah, et al.
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
If Mr. Howell's mom knows the Court, is that a fair forum for Petitioner?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. If Mr. Howell’s mom knows the Court, is that a fair forum for Petitioner? 2. Should the Speak Out Act result in nationwide expansion of sexual harassment statute of limitations to a standard of 3 years? 3. Should the Court consider retroactive application to 2015 to allow victims to come forward based on the Speak Out Act? 4, Should the Court adopt a nationwide standard for litigation privilege for sexual harassment victims? 5. Should the judges that allow such deviance from trial processes be allowed to have their jobs? By what process can they be removed? 6. What is the way to get reparations for lost time from the state for botching a fair trial and allowing involuntary servitude? 7. Ifthe underlying case had allegations to Human Trafficking for Labor, then how can Petitioner allege this without retaliation? 8. Did the Court go too far in not removing the qualified immunity doctrine from 42 U.S.C. §1983? . 9. Does the Utah Court’s trial delay a use of excessive force; excessive sanctions a violation of 1st, 8th and 14th amendment of the constitution in light of its refusal to allow evidentiary hearings and withhold money due by contract and statute? 10.Should Utah lose its comity till it brings up its services given the total denial of services and because Utah wrote a strong letter in support of harassment victims? 11. If two women have died due to Utah's law enforcement misconduct, Gabby Petito and Zhifan Dong, is Utah safe for any woman of any color? 12.Should the Court consider naming the expansion of harassment reporting statute of limitations and retroactive application to Hill, Dong, and Petito Apology? 2