No. 22-953
Pablo Calderon v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-charges criminal-procedure district-court due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-statute habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation substantive-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-04-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a federal district court have habeas corpus jurisdiction when a substantive element of the criminal charges was not found under the law mandated by federal statute?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does a federal district court have habeas corpus jurisdiction when a substantive element of the criminal charges was not found under the law mandated by federal statute?
Docket Entries
2023-04-24
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
2023-04-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-03-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2023)
2023-02-15
Application (22A748) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 30, 2023.
2023-02-13
Application (22A748) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 28, 2023 to March 30, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent