Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court can defer ruling on qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage without triggering an immediate appeal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a district court can defer ruling on qualified immunity at the motion-to-dismiss stage without triggering an immediate appeal. 2. Whether a plaintiff is forbidden from seeking any discovery against an immunity-asserting defendant until that claim of immunity is resolved, even if the discovery is related to a claim against a separate defendant with no entitlement to qualified immunity. (i)
2023-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-12
Reply of petitioners Gwendolyn Carswell, individually and as dependent administrator of and on behalf of the estate of Gary Valdez Lynch III and Gary Valdez Lynch III’s heirs at law filed. (Distributed)
2023-06-23
Brief of respondents George Camp, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-05-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 26, 2023.
2023-05-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 25, 2023 to June 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-25
Response Requested. (Due May 25, 2023)
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-14
Waiver of right of respondent George Camp, et al. to respond filed.
2023-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2023)
2023-02-07
Application (22A706) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until March 30, 2023.
2023-02-02
Application (22A706) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 28, 2023 to April 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.