Whether the California Court of Appeal erred in holding that the California doctrine of 'equitable tolling' applied so as to toll the one-year statute of limitations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) in derogation of this Court's express holding and rationale as articulated in Rotkiske v. Klemm, 589 US. __, 140 S.Ct. 355, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the California Court of Appeal erred in holding that the California doctrine of “equitable tolling” applied so as to toll the one-year statute of limitations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) in derogation of this Court’s express holding and rationale as articulated in Rotkiske v. Klemm, 589 US. __, 140 S.Ct. 355, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019).