No. 22O139
Mississippi, Plaintiff v. City of Memphis Tennessee, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, and Tennessee
Relisted (3)
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question presented not available.
Docket Entries
2010-01-25
Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied without prejudice. See Virginia v. Maryland, 540 U. S. 56, 74, n.9 (2003); Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U. S. 176, 187, n. 13 (1982).
2010-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 22, 2010.
2010-01-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2010.
2009-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2010.
2009-12-16
Reply of State of Mississippi, Plaintiff to brief in opposition of State of Tennessee to motion for leave to Bill of Complaint in Original Action filed. (Distributed).
2009-12-16
State of Mississippi's reply to brief in opposition to motion for leave to file Bill of Complaint of City of Memphis, Tennessee, and Memphis Light, Gas & Water division filed. (Distributed)
2009-12-02
Brief of Defendant State of Tennesee in Opposition to State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint.
2009-12-02
Brief of Defendant City of Memphis Tennessee and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division in Opposition to State of Mississippi's Motion for Leave to File a Bill of Complaint.
2009-09-23
Order extending time to file response to the motion for leave to file a bill of complaint for all defendants to and including December 2, 2009.
2009-09-02
Motion for leave to file a bill of complaint filed.
Attorneys
City of Memphis Tennessee and Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division,
Leo M. Bearman — Respondent
Mississippi, Plaintiff
Alan Barner Cameron — Petitioner
State of Tennessee
David C. Frederick — Respondent
Tennessee
William Barry Turner — Deputy Attorney General, Respondent