No. 23-1002

Tony R. Hewitt v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-12
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law first-step-act judicial-vacatur mandatory-minimum post-enactment-sentencing retroactivity sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-07-01 (distributed 3 times)
Related Cases: 23-1150 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Step Act's sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the FSA's enactment when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the FSA's enactment

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED The First Step Act (FSA) significantly reduced the mandatory minimum sentences for several federal drug and firearm offenses. First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, §§ 401, 403, 132 Stat. 5194, 5220-5222. Sections 401 and 403 apply to offenses committed after the FSA’s enactment on December 21, 2018, and to “any offense that was committed before the date of enactment * * * if a sentence for the offense has not been imposed as of such date of enactment.” FSA §§ 401(c), 403(b). There is an acknowledged split between the Third, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits, on the one hand; and the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, on the other hand, on the question whether sections 401(c) and 403(b) apply when a pre-enactment sentence is vacated and the court must impose a new post-enactment sentence. The question presented accordingly is as follows: Whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the FSA’s enactment when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the FSA’s enactment.

Docket Entries

2025-07-28
Judgment Issued.
2024-12-16
Reply of United States submitted.
2024-12-16
Reply of Tony R. Hewitt submitted.
2024-12-16
Reply of Corey Deyon Duffey and Jarvis Dupree Ross submitted.
2024-12-03
CIRCULATED
2024-11-12
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2024-11-04
Motion of United States for divided argument submitted.
2024-11-04
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
2024-09-06
Motion of Tony R. Hewitt to dispense with joint appendix submitted.
2024-07-29
Motion of Tony R. Hewitt for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-02
Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 23-1150 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-06-03
2024-05-30
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2024-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2024.
2024-04-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2024 to May 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-11
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2024-04-04
2024-03-28
Response Requested. (Due April 29, 2024)
2024-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-08

Attorneys

American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Cato Institute, Due Process Institute, FAMM, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Kevin James PoloncarzCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
American Civil Liberties Union, et al.
Emma Anamaria AnderssonAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Amicus
Emma Anamaria AnderssonAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Amicus
Corey Deyon Duffey and Jarvis Dupree Ross
Jo-Ann Tamila SagarHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Jo-Ann Tamila SagarHogan Lovells US LLP, Petitioner
Court-appointed amicus curiae in support of the judgment below
Michael Hugh McGinleyDechert LLP, Amicus
Michael Hugh McGinleyDechert LLP, Respondent
Michael Hugh McGinleyDechert LLP, Amicus
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Kevin James PoloncarzCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
Kevin James PoloncarzCovington & Burling LLP, Amicus
Senators Richard J. Durbin, Charles E. Grassley, Cory A. Booker, and Michael S. Lee
Brent Jefferson GurneyWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Amicus
Brent Jefferson GurneyWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Amicus
The District of Columbia, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Vermont
Caroline Sage Van ZileOff. of the Att'y Gen. for D.C., Amicus
Caroline Sage Van ZileOff. of the Att'y Gen. for D.C., Amicus
Tony R. Hewitt
Michael B. KimberlyWinston & Strawn LLP, Petitioner
Michael B. KimberlyMcDermott Will & Emery LLP, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Sarah M. HarrisActing Solicitor General, Respondent