Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the First Step Act's sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the FSA's enactment when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the FSA's enactment
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED The First Step Act (FSA) significantly reduced the mandatory minimum sentences for several federal drug and firearm offenses. First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, §§ 401, 403, 132 Stat. 5194, 5220-5222. Sections 401 and 403 apply to offenses committed after the FSA’s enactment on December 21, 2018, and to “any offense that was committed before the date of enactment * * * if a sentence for the offense has not been imposed as of such date of enactment.” FSA §§ 401(c), 403(b). There is an acknowledged split between the Third, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits, on the one hand; and the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, on the other hand, on the question whether sections 401(c) and 403(b) apply when a pre-enactment sentence is vacated and the court must impose a new post-enactment sentence. The question presented accordingly is as follows: Whether the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant originally sentenced before the FSA’s enactment when that original sentence is judicially vacated and the defendant is resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the FSA’s enactment.
2024-12-16
Reply of United States submitted.
2024-12-16
Reply of Tony R. Hewitt submitted.
2024-12-16
Reply of Corey Deyon Duffey and Jarvis Dupree Ross submitted.
2024-11-12
Record received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2024-11-04
Motion of United States for divided argument submitted.
2024-11-04
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
2024-09-06
Motion of Tony R. Hewitt to dispense with joint appendix submitted.
2024-07-29
Motion of Tony R. Hewitt for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-02
Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 23-1150 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-06-03
Reply of petitioner Tony R. Hewitt filed. (Distributed)
2024-05-30
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2024-04-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 29, 2024.
2024-04-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2024 to May 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-11
Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.
2024-04-04
Brief amici curiae of American Civil Liberties Union, et al. filed.
2024-03-28
Response Requested. (Due April 29, 2024)
2024-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 11, 2024)
American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, Cato Institute, Due Process Institute, FAMM, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
The District of Columbia, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, and Vermont