No. 23-1006

In Re Christopher Gary Baylor

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appeal civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech judicial-delay mandamus-jurisdiction right-to-appeal section-1657 standing
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does relief become implied denied upon the expiration of time to grant or deny, and if no, when does absence of any judgment, ruling, decision, decree, or Order more than 550 days begin to trigger an appeal or review?

Does the district court when it refuses to enter for more than 550 days, any judgment, decision, ruling, decision, decree or Order chill speech or violate rights to appeal, petition or review?

Does district court chill speech or violate the right to be heard when without cause stays or holds in abeyance a case absent any Notice, ruling, decision, Order, judgment or decree?

Does the district court usurp Section 1657 of U.S. Code, 28, when it refuses to exercise its inherent authority to expedite in civil cases, requests for immediate injunctive relief?

Does an appellate court violate Amendment 5 when it first permits a response, then denies that right when it then dismisses without first allowing opportunity to first be heard on all arguments prior to the dismissal of an appeal?

Might this Court then "stand in the shoes of the Court of Appeals," pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(e), and § 2072(a) if the Eleventh Circuit would decline review pursuant to § 1292(a) or exercise mandamus jurisdiction?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does relief become impliedly denied upon the expiration of time to grant or deny, and if no, when does absence of any judgment, ruling, decision, decree, or Order more than 550 days begin to trigger an appeal or review?

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-03-20
Waiver of right of respondents Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston, Jamie R. Grosshans, Jorge Labarga, John D. Couriel, Brian D. Lambert, F. Rand Wallis, James A. Edwards, Eric J. Eisnaugle, John M. Harris, Robert J. Morris, Jr., Craig C. Villanti, Suzanne Y. Labrit, Daniel H. Sleet, Anth to respond filed.
2024-03-07
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due April 12, 2024)

Attorneys

Charles T. Canady, Ricky Polston, Jamie R. Grosshans, Jorge Labarga, John D. Couriel, Brian D. Lambert, F. Rand Wallis, James A. Edwards, Eric J. Eisnaugle, John M. Harris, Robert J. Morris, Jr., Craig C. Villanti, Suzanne Y. Labrit, Daniel H. Sleet, Anth
Charles Joseph Finegan Schreiber Jr.Office of the Attorney General, State of Florida, Respondent
In Re Christopher Gary Baylor
Christopher Gary Baylor — Petitioner