No. 23-1008
Gwyneth K. Murray-Nolan v. Scott Rubin, et al.
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law context due-process expressive-conduct first-amendment free-speech judicial-precedent legal-interpretation standing
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment CriminalProcedure JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether conduct must convey a particularized message to be protected as expressive under the First Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether conduct must convey a particularized message to be protected as expressive under the First Amendment. 2. Whether the full context of conduct must be considered to determine its expressive nature. ii LIST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 22-2702, Murray-Nolan v. Rubin et al., judgment entered February 5, 2024. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, No. 22-801 (EP), Murray-Nolan v. Rubin et al., judgment entered September 8, 2022.
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Gwyneth K. Murray-Nolan
Christopher E. Mills — Spero Law LLC, Petitioner
Christopher E. Mills — Spero Law LLC, Petitioner