No. 23-1022
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal-waiver circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process factual-basis guilty-plea plea-agreement plea-bargaining
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a plea agreement's appeal waiver can bar a defendant from pursuing a claim that the plea rested on an inadequate factual basis
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(3) requires a district court to “determine that there is a factual basis” for a guilty plea before accepting it. The Question Presented is whether a plea agreement’s appeal waiver can bar a defendant from pursuing a claim that the plea rested on an inadequate factual basis.
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-06-04
Reply of petitioner Nancy Martin filed. (Distributed)
2024-05-17
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-04-15
Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute, et al. filed.
2024-04-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 17, 2024.
2024-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 17, 2024 to May 17, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2024)
2024-01-22
Application (23A667) granted by Justice Gorsuch extending the time to file until March 14, 2024.
2024-01-17
Application (23A667) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 13, 2024 to April 12, 2024, submitted to Justice Gorsuch.
Attorneys
Cato Institute, Wilson Institute, Jonas Foundation & NACDL
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
Clark M. Neily III — Cato Institute, Amicus
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent