No. 23-1046

Peter George Noe v. Berkley, Dr., et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: bivens bivens-action civil-rights civil-rights-remedy constitutional-claim due-process federal-agents federal-tort-claims-act judicial-precedent medical-care medical-indifference standing
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity FourthAmendment FifthAmendment Punishment
Latest Conference: 2024-05-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Bivens claim can be maintained for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a cause of action can be maintained under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), in circumstances not meaningfully different from that of the claim for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs recognized in Carlson v. Green, 446 U.S. 14 (1980). @

Docket Entries

2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-04-22
Brief amicus curiae of Dr. Anne S. Douds filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2024)
PetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountPetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

Dr. Anne S. Douds
Matthew Scott Rozen — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Matthew Scott Rozen — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Amicus
Peter George Noe
Joshua Morgan Wesneski — Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Petitioner
Joshua Morgan Wesneski — Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent