Whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires a plaintiff challenging at-large elections to propose a remedy that does not alter the State's chosen electoral model

QUESTIONS PRESENTED For nearly 40 years, this Court has analyzed claims of vote dilution under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 using the framework established in Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986). This Court reaffirmed that familiar framework in Allen v. Milligan, 599 U.S. 1 (2023). The questions presented are: 1. In a vote-dilution challenge to at-large elections imposed by state law, does Section 2 also require a plaintiff to propose a remedy that does not alter the State’s chosen electoral model? 2. Are a State’s asserted policy interests for its choice of at-large elections entitled to insurmountable weight under Section 2? (i)