No. 23-1083

Shula Waxwoman, fka Shlomit Ruttkamp v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al.

Lower Court: Connecticut
Docketed: 2024-04-04
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: constitutional-protection covid-19 due-process equal-protection eviction-stay foreclosure foreclosure-moratorium fraud-misrepresentation judicial-procedure property-rights state-of-emergency
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lifting of COVID-19 foreclosure moratoriums deprives individuals of due process and equal protection

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions presented as follows: 1. Is the lifting of the COVID-19 State . Foreclosure Moratoriums and Stays Governor’s Tenth Supplemental State of Emergency Proclamation of May 21, 2020, (the protections against evictions) should deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law and deny any defendants the protection of his . or her day in court and the benefit of the general law. SIL Whether a judge should disregard new sufficient evidence of fraud and misrepresentation of facts to the court because of a previous Appellate Court ruling. Can a judge hear his own motion to disqualify and still apply due process and equal protection of the law? . Il. Whether there is an objective basis in fact for the statement that the honorable . Connecticut Appellate Court repeatedly declined to protect the constitutional rights of a “Pro Se” foreclosure defendants.

Docket Entries

2024-08-19
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-07-25
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-07-02
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-02-01

Attorneys

Shula Waxwoman
Shula Waxwoman — Petitioner
Shula Waxwoman — Petitioner