Whether federal law or the U.S. Constitution authorize federal judges to penalize persons for stating federal judges violated rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether any federal law or the U.S. Constitution authorize any federal judge to penalize or punish any person because such person stated in written fed. eral court filings that one or more federal judges know__ ingly violated rights and freedoms expressly secured to . persons by the U.S. Constitution and federal laws or . that such judge(s) committed federal offenses (e.g., in 18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1341, 1348, 1349, 1512 , or 1519). : 2. When an attorney challenges reciprocal disbarment, whether federal law or the U.S. Constitution authorize any federal court (including the U.S. Su. preme Court) to disbar an attorney (i.e., deprive the attorney of his liberty and property, eg., license to i practice his profession in such court) for purported misconduct without such federal court, itself, expressly i : identifying the particular standard(s) of conduct such : court concluded were relevant, identifying the attorney conduct that purportedly violated any such standard, identifying the facts material to proving how any such attorney conduct violated any such standard, and iden: tifying the evidence that was admissible and admitted to prove all material facts. _ . ii ; QUESTIONS PRESENTED—Continued . 8. When an attorney challenges reciprocal disbarment and requests a hearing, whether federal law ’ governing federal courts or the U.S. Constitution authorize any federal court (including the U.S. Supreme ; Court) to disbar such attorney before affording such at: torney advance notice of the standards such court (at : least initially) concluded were violated and the conduct . that such court (at least initially) concluded violated . any such standard and a hearing, in compliance with : the Federal Rules of Evidence, regarding any issue identified (in federal law, our Constitution or U.S. Supreme Court precedent) as relevant. iii DIRECTLY