No. 23-1110

Gerald S. Ostipow, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Royetta L. Ostipow v. William L. Federspiel

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-investigation criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment just-compensation property-rights property-seizure taking takings
Key Terms:
Takings FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the non-return and indefinite retention of non-forfeited private property (or its monetary equivalent), when initially seized for a criminal investigation, constitute a taking when the criminal investigation and prosecution have long been completed?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the non-return and indefinite retention of non-forfeited private property (or its monetary equivalent), when initially seized for a criminal investigation, constitute a taking when the criminal investigation and prosecution have long been completed? -l

Docket Entries

2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-06
2024-04-10
2024-01-09
Application (23A628) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 14, 2024.
2023-01-04
Application (23A628) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 14, 2024 to April 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Gerald Ostipow
Philip Lee EllisonOutside Legal Counsel PLC, Petitioner
William L. Federspiel
Douglas James CurlewCummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.L.C., Respondent