No. 23-1110
Gerald S. Ostipow, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Royetta L. Ostipow v. William L. Federspiel
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-investigation criminal-procedure due-process fifth-amendment just-compensation property-rights property-seizure taking takings
Key Terms:
Takings FifthAmendment
Takings FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the non-return and indefinite retention of non-forfeited private property (or its monetary equivalent), when initially seized for a criminal investigation, constitute a taking when the criminal investigation and prosecution have long been completed?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the non-return and indefinite retention of non-forfeited private property (or its monetary equivalent), when initially seized for a criminal investigation, constitute a taking when the criminal investigation and prosecution have long been completed? -l
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-05-06
Brief of respondent William L. Federspiel in opposition filed.
2024-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 13, 2024)
2024-01-09
Application (23A628) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 14, 2024.
2023-01-04
Application (23A628) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 14, 2024 to April 14, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Gerald Ostipow
Philip Lee Ellison — Outside Legal Counsel PLC, Petitioner
William L. Federspiel
Douglas James Curlew — Cummings, McClorey, Davis & Acho, P.L.C., Respondent