No. 23-1123

In Re Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-04-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: due-process first-amendment judicial-recusal local-court-rules local-rules rules-enabling-act supervisory-power third-circuit
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2024-06-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this Court exercise its supervisory duty over local rules and the administration of justice in the federal courts and assign a hearing panel composed of judges from outside of the Third Circuit because the Third Circuit is 'part of the accusatory process' and it has 'becomes embroiled in a running bitter controversy' or should this Court renege on its supervisory duty over the lower courts and nullify the People's First Amendment freedoms by local rule?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is should this Court exercise its supervisory duty over local rules and the administration of justice in the federal courts and assign ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED—Continued a hearing panel composed of judges from outside of the Third Circuit because the Third Circuit is “part of the accusatory process” and it has “becomes embroiled in a running bitter controversy” or should this Court renege on its supervisory duty over the lower courts and nullify the People’s First Amendment freedoms by local rule?

Docket Entries

2024-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-09
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due May 17, 2024)

Attorneys

Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Joseph Robert GianniniLawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission , Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent