No. 23-1134

Mark Habelt v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: appeal case-dismissal civil-procedure dismissal financial-stake judicial-procedure legal-redress litigation-appeal plaintiff-standing redress standing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri ClassAction
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a named plaintiff who initiated a suit from which he was never dismissed or removed, who retains a financial stake in the litigation's outcome, and who could be precluded from pursuing further redress have standing to appeal?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Does a named plaintiff who initiated a suit from which he was never dismissed or removed, who retains a financial stake in the litigation’s outcome, and who could be precluded from pursuing further redress have standing to appeal?

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-16
Reply of petitioner Mark Habelt filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-08-16
Reply of petitioner Mark Habelt, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-08-16
Reply of Mark Habelt, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated submitted.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-08-02
Brief of respondents iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of ServiceMain DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-08-02
Brief of iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al. in opposition submitted.
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
2024-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 2, 2024.
2024-06-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 5, 2024 to August 2, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service
2024-06-04
Response Requested. (Due July 5, 2024)
2024-05-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
2024-05-20
Waiver of right of respondent iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2024-04-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2024)
PetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountPetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-04-01
Application (23A791) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 16, 2024.
2024-03-25
Application (23A791) to extend further the time from April 4, 2024 to April 16, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Written RequestProof of ServiceWritten RequestProof of Service
2024-02-27
Application (23A791) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until April 4, 2024.
2024-02-23
Application (23A791) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 5, 2024 to April 4, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceMain DocumentProof of Service

Attorneys

iRhythm Technologies, Inc., et al.
Steffen Nathanael Johnson — Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Respondent
Mark Habelt, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Xiao Wang — University of Virginia School of Law, Petitioner
Omar Jafri — Pomerantz LLP, Petitioner