No. 23-114
Sharon A. Finizie v. Denis R. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure factual-findings judicial-procedure legal-error legal-errors misapplication-of-law rule-of-law standard-of-review third-circuit
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy
SocialSecurity EmploymentDiscrimina Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplication of a properly stated rule of law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Did the decision of the of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplication of a properly stated rule of law? i LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs to respond filed.
2023-08-01
Attorneys
Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Sharon Finizie
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner