No. 23-1149

Stephen M. Calk, aka Sealed Defendant 1 v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Experienced Counsel
Tags: bank-bribery commercial-value corrupt-intent criminal-intent due-process felony felony-statute statutory-interpretation thing-of-value
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether something with no commercial or objective value can constitute a 'thing of value' that 'exceed[s] $1,000,' the receipt of which is punishable as a felony under the bank bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 215

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether something with no commercial or objective value can constitute a “thing of value” that “exceed[s] $1,000,” the receipt of which is punishable as a felony under the bank bribery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 215. 2. Whether the bank bribery statute’s “corrupt” intent element requires a breach of a bank officer’s duty to act in the best interests of the bank or can instead be satisfied by acts undertaken with a good-faith belief they will benefit the bank.

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-06
Reply of Stephen M. Calk submitted.
2024-08-06
2024-07-24
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2024-07-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 24, 2024.
2024-06-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 24, 2024 to July 24, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 24, 2024.
2024-05-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 23, 2024 to June 24, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2024)

Attorneys

Stephen M. Calk
Alexandra Anastasia Ekaterina ShapiroShapiro Arato Bach LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent