No. 23-1154
Kurtis M. Bailey, et al. v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation, et al.
Tags: appeal case-redress civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-disqualification disqualification-of-counsel due-process justice-stevens legal-modification standing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should Richardson-Merrell,-Inc.-v.-Koller-be-modified
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424, be modified so that the disqualification of counsel does not result in a catastrophic violation of due process that is not capable of redress, as was foreseen by Justice Stevens in his dissent, and as was demonstrated in this case?
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Kurtis M. Bailey, et al.
Daniel Jason Russo — Maas & Russo LLP, Petitioner