Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III when agency action causes substantial resource diversion of an organization and exposes children they represent to an unvetted and unsafe “vaccine”, in light of this Court’s conflicting injury-in-fact standards set forth in United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, 412 U.S. 669 (1973) and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 495 U.S. 418 (2021)?