No. 23-1170
Franck William Yao v. Tamara Yao
Tags: best-interest-of-child best-interest-standard child-custody civil-procedure dual-citizenship expert-witness family-law judicial-consideration state-court testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state courts erred in using Petitioner's dual-citizenship-status as consideration in their final-judgment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the state courts erred in using Petitioner’s dual citizenship status as consideration in their final judgment. Whether the state courts properly considered the best interest of the child as a necessary component In evaluating the efficacy of the expert witness’s testimony. Whether the expert witness properly testified to facts and testimony provided by another witness.
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-05
Application (24A129) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2024-08-01
Application (24A129) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
2024-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Franck Yao
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner