No. 23-1174

Peter Kleidman v. Hilton & Hyland Real Estate, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-05-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: circuit-split evidence-rule expert-testimony federal-rule-of-evidence-704(a) federal-rules judicial-interpretation legal-duties ninth-circuit petition-for-writ-of-certiorari
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does Federal Rule of Evidence 704(a) allow an expert to opine on a person's compliance with legal duties?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does Federal Rule of Evidence 704(a) (“Rule ; 704{a)”) allow an expert to opine that a person's conduct complied with the person’s legal duties? ; Does Rule 704(a) allow an expert to opine on the : nature and extent of a person’s legal duties? Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that under : Rule 704(a), Respondents’ expert witness was allowed to testify that Respondents’ conduct complied with their legal duties to Kleidman? Did the Ninth Circuit err-in holding that under Rule 704(a), Respondents’ expert witness was ; allowed to testify on the nature and extent of Respondents’ legal duties to Kleidman? ; ii PARTIES TO.THE PROCEEDING Hilton & Hyland Real Estate, Inc., Matthew ; Altman, Joshua. Altman. : . STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-04-22

Attorneys

Peter Kleidman
Peter Kleidman — Petitioner
Peter Kleidman — Petitioner