No. 23-1181
Amici (1)
Tags: autopsy-report confrontation-clause criminal-investigation criminal-procedure evidence hearsay-evidence medical-examiner medical-examiner-testimony sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the admission of an autopsy report and testimony from a doctor who neither participated in the autopsy nor prepared the report violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation-Clause?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the admission of an autopsy report and testimony from a doctor who neither participated in the autopsy nor prepared the report violate the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-24
Reply of petitioner Gail M. Ritchey filed. (Distributed)
2024-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-30
Brief amicus curiae of Office of the Ohio Public Defender filed.
2024-05-29
Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
2024-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 31, 2024)
2024-02-28
Application (23A794) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 27, 2024.
2024-02-16
Application (23A794) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 27, 2024 to April 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Gail M. Ritchey
Steven Larry Bradley — Marein and Bradley, Petitioner
Office of the Ohio Public Defender
State of Ohio
Nicholas Andrew Burling — Geauga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent