Is an officer's intentional use of substantial and aggressive force against a pre-trial detainee in response to mere passive resistance to a strip search an example of a 'rare obvious case, where the unlawfulness of the officer's conduct is sufficiently clear even though existing precedent does not address similar circumstances' precluding qualified immunity?

Questions Presented 1. Is an officer's intentional use of substantial and aggressive force against a pre-trial detainee in response to mere passive resistance to a strip search an example of a "rare obvious case, where the unlawfulness of the officer's conduct is sufficiently clear even though existing precedent does not address similar circumstances" precluding qualified immunity? 2. Is a municipality liable for an injury caused by its official policy that allows the use of substantial and aggressive force against a pre-trial detainee for mere passive resistance to a strip search? i