No. 23-1209

M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. v. Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2024-05-13
Status: Granted
Type: Paid
CVSGAmici (12)Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: actuarial-assumptions circuit-split employee-retirement-income-security-act erisa multiemployer-pension multiemployer-pension-plan plan-year statutory-interpretation withdrawal-liability
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA LaborRelations
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether 29 U.S.C. 1391's instruction to compute withdrawal liability 'as of the end of the plan year' requires the plan to base the computation on the actuarial assumptions to which its actuary subscribed at the end of the year, or allows the plan to use different actuarial assumptions that were adopted after the end of the year

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Employee Retirement Income Security Act imposes “withdrawal liability’ when an employer withdraws from an underfunded multiemployer pension plan. This withdrawal labilty covers the employer’s share of the plan’s underfunding. Because a plan’s amount of underfunding hinges on projections about its projected liabilities and assets decades into the future, withdrawal liability computations are partly a product of actuarial assumptions about anticipated interest rates and other predictions. Withdrawal liability must be computed “as of the end of the plan year preceding the plan year in which the employer withdraws.” E.g., 29 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2)(E)@). The question presented is: Whether 29 U.S.C. 1391’s instruction to compute withdrawal liability “as of the end of the plan year” requires the plan to base the computation on the actuarial assumptions to which its actuary subscribed at the end of the year, or allows the plan to use different actuarial assumptions that were adopted after the end of the year.

Docket Entries

2026-01-20
Argued. For petitioners: Michael E. Kenneally, Jr., Washington, D. C. For respondent: John E. Roberts, Providence, R. I., and Kevin J. Barber, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)
2025-12-09
Record received from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The record is electronic and is available on PACER.
2025-12-09
Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and available with the Clerk.
2025-12-01
CIRCULATED
2025-11-18
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
2025-11-13
Reply of petitioners M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. filed.
2025-11-13
Reply of M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. submitted.
2025-11-12
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, January 20, 2026.
2025-11-10
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.
2025-10-21
Brief amici curiae of The Segal Group, Inc., et al. filed.
2025-10-21
Amicus brief of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations submitted.
2025-10-21
Amicus brief of The Pension Rights Center submitted.
2025-10-21
Amicus brief of United States submitted.
2025-10-21
Motion of United States for leave to participate in oral argument and for divided argument submitted.
2025-10-21
Amicus brief of AARP and AARP Foundation submitted.
2025-10-21
Amicus brief of The Segal Group, Inc., Horizon Actuarial Services, LLC, Milliman, Inc., and Cheiron, Inc. submitted.
2025-10-21
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2025-10-21
Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed.
2025-10-21
Brief amici curiae of AARP, et al. filed.
2025-10-21
Brief amicus curiae of The Pension Rights Center filed.
2025-10-21
Brief amicus curiae of Pension Rights Center filed.
2025-10-21
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.
2025-10-20
Brief amicus curiae of National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans filed.
2025-10-20
Amicus brief of National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans submitted.
2025-10-14
Brief of respondents Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund filed.
2025-10-14
Brief of Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund submitted.
2025-09-04
Brief amicus curiae of HR Policy Association filed.
2025-09-04
Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
2025-09-04
Brief amicus curiae of James P. Naughton filed.
2025-09-04
Amicus brief of HR Policy Association submitted.
2025-09-04
Amicus brief of James P. Naughton submitted.
2025-09-04
Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America submitted.
2025-08-28
Brief of petitioners M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. filed.
2025-08-28
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2025-08-28
Joint Appendix submitted.
2025-08-28
Brief of M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. submitted.
2025-07-17
Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2025. The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 14, 2025.
2025-07-17
Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.
2025-07-03
The order granting the petition for a writ of certiorari is amended as follows. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Whether 29 U. S. C. §1391’s instruction to compute withdrawal liability “as of the end of the plan year” requires the plan to base the computation on the actuarial assumptions most recently adopted before the end of the year, or allows the plan to use different actuarial assumptions that were adopted after, but based on information available as of, the end of the year.
2025-06-30
Petition GRANTED limited to the following question: Whether 29 U. S. C. §1391’s instruction to compute withdrawal liability “as of the end of the plan year” requires the plan to base the computation on the actuarial assumptions to which its actuary subscribed at the end of the year, or allows the plan to use different actuarial assumptions that were adopted after the end of the year.
2025-06-10
Supplemental Brief of M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. submitted.
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-10
Supplemental brief of petitioners M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-06-06
Supplemental brief of respondents Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund filed. (Distributed)
2025-06-06
Supplemental Brief of Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund submitted.
2025-05-27
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2024-10-07
The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
2024-07-31
Reply of petitioners M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-07-31
Reply of M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al. submitted.
2024-07-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-12
Brief of respondent Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund in opposition filed.
2024-07-12
Brief of Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund in opposition submitted.
2024-06-12
Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.
2024-05-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 12, 2024.
2024-05-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 12, 2024 to July 12, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 12, 2024)

Attorneys

AARP and AARP Foundation
Rachel Notandi LokkenAARP Foundation, Amicus
Rachel Notandi LokkenAARP Foundation, Amicus
Rachel Notandi LokkenAARP Foundation, Amicus
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations
Darin Matthew DalmatAFL-CIO, Amicus
Darin Matthew DalmatAFL-CIO, Amicus
Darin Matthew DalmatAFL-CIO, Amicus
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Jonathan Saul FranklinNorton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Amicus
Jonathan Saul FranklinNorton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Amicus
Jonathan Saul FranklinNorton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Amicus
HR Policy Association
Sarah Bryan FaskLittler Mendelson, PC, Amicus
Sarah Bryan FaskLittler Mendelson, PC, Amicus
Sarah Bryan FaskLittler Mendelson, PC, Amicus
James P. Naughton
Mark McKay TrappConn Maciel Carey LLP, Amicus
Mark McKay TrappConn Maciel Carey LLP, Amicus
Mark McKay TrappConn Maciel Carey LLP, Amicus
M & K Employee Solutions, LLC, et al.
Michael Edward Kenneally Jr.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Michael Edward Kenneally Jr.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
Michael Edward Kenneally Jr.Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Petitioner
National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans
Paul Andrew GreenSuite 700, Amicus
Paul Andrew GreenSuite 700, Amicus
Paul Andrew GreenSuite 700, Amicus
The Pension Rights Center
Israel GoldowitzThe Wagner Law Group, Amicus
Israel GoldowitzThe Wagner Law Group, Amicus
Israel GoldowitzThe Wagner Law Group, Amicus
The Segal Group, Inc., Horizon Actuarial Services, LLC, Milliman, Inc., and Cheiron, Inc.
Samuel Isaac LevinGroom Law Group, Chartered, Amicus
Samuel Isaac LevinGroom Law Group, Chartered, Amicus
Samuel Isaac LevinGroom Law Group, Chartered, Amicus
Trustees of the IAM National Pension Fund
John Edward RobertsProskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
John Edward RobertsProskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
John Edward RobertsProskauer Rose LLP, Respondent
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Amicus
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Amicus
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Amicus
Moez Mansoor KabaHueston Hennigan LLP, Amicus