County of Fulton, Pennsylvania, et al. v. Al Schmidt, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.
Securities Privacy
Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court err in allowing a special master to order voting machines owned by the County of Fulton to be placed in custody of a third party, where the Pennsylvania General Assembly delegated the exclusive power to manage procedures regarding elections and voting equipment to County Boards of Elections?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court err in allowing a Special Master to order that voting machines owned by the County of Fulton were to be placed in custody of a third party, where under Article I, section 4 of the United States Constitution, the Pennsylvania General Assembly delegated the exclusive power to manage procedures regarding elections and voting equipment to County Boards of Elections? 2. Did the Pennsylvania Supreme Court err in sanctioning the Petitioners and their attorneys for having experts analyze voting machines that the County Board of Elections bought under contract, where the Pennsylvania General Assembly has delegated its plenary constitutional authority pursuant to Article J, section 4 of the Constitution to appoint experts and examine and analyze voting machines to the county boards of elections, and pursuant to that authority Petitioners had such analyses performed for the purposes of fulfilling its delegated responsibilities under the Constitution?