Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's questioned Orders amount to an unlawful denial of due process, an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction, or a grave abuse of discretion

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I Whether, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, questioned Orders amounts to unlawful denial of due process: an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction or grave abuse of discretion which is tantamount to 7 ; lack of jurisdiction in the findings of law or of fact, in ; ruling pro se petitioner abandoned our asserted : claims of violations and denial of Civil Rights, by U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Judges stating they cannot locate or find argument in plaintiff — appellant’s initial opening brief. II Whether, United States District Court — Division of Middle Georgia, Judge Clay D. Land, questioned Orders dismissing petitioner's Complaints with prejudice as a shotgun pleading, and refusal to consider pro se _ petitioner’s Second Amended Complaint, amounts to an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction, unlawful denial of due process, or grave abuse of discretion which is tantamount to lack of jurisdiction in the findings of law or of fact. it . III Whether, Magistrate Court, Georgetown — Quitman County, Georgia, questioned Order amounts to an oppressive exercise of judicial power in excess of jurisdiction; unlawful denial of due process; or grave abuse of discretion which is tantamount to lack of jurisdiction in the findings of law or of fact where Court Officials refused to allow pro se petitioner to ; put on our case and subsequently failed or refused to process pro se petitioner’s timely filed de novo appeal as of right in the Superior Court of Quitman — County, Georgia, under Georgia Code § 5-3-20 (2021). IV Whether, Isabel Stoval, Chief Appraiser, Georgetown ‘ — Quitman County, Georgia, whom wrongfully took away petitioner's already approved disabled American veteran Homestead Tax Exemption, that under state statute O.C.G.A. 48 ~ 5 — 48 (2010) (e) Not more often than once every three years, the county board of tax assessors may require the holder of an exemption granted pursuant to this Code section to substantiate his continuing eligibility for the exemption. In no event may the board require more than three doctors’ letters to substantiate eligibility, once approved, without cue process, that causes harm to petitioner, is liable for discrimination, . retaliation, conspiracy against petitioner on the iii basis of disability, race, religion, and/or gender, to deprive petitioner of civil rights and liberty. Vv Whether Urvashi Foster, B.J. Foster, Deputy Brooks, Sheriff Department, Georgetown — Quitman County, Georgia, Jeannie Tupper, attorney, and Judge Patrick C. Bagwell is liable for hub and spoke conspiracy against petitioner.