On what grounds does Missouri continue to deny the fundamental civil rights of people living with Brain Injury in the Missouri Judicial System?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1.) On what grounds does Missouri continue to deny the fundamental civil rights of a whole class of people, namely people living with Brain Injury, who try to navigate the Missouri Judicial System with their particular legal efforts? 2.) How does Missouri, in providing no accommodation specifically to the needs and challenges of people living with Brain Injury due to their Brain Injuries, at all and any points of contact with the Missouri Judicial System, not deny the Brain Injured Community therein, fair access to the Courts and fair rule of law in its Missouri jurisdictions, given the nature of cognitive impairments that are medically, and scientifically recognized, and at the Federal level recognized, to be associated with disability from Brain Injury? 3.) How is denying a Brain-Injured Individual any accommodation specifically to their needs and challenges living with Brain Injury due to their Brain Injuries, and effectively closing the doors of Missouri’s Courts and Justice System therein shut to them by making the matter of timing, deadlines, scheduled appointments and statute of limitations, essentially a series of eligibility barriers to people living with Brain Injury, of a non-Brain-Injured standard of timing to have fair access to the Courts and the rule of law therein, not a violation of the most fundamental of civil rights in the United States, and the fundamental civil rights of that Brain-Injured individual, so treated by Missouri? 4.) How can the State of Missouri and other Missouri Public Entities’ be allowed to violate numerous Federal Laws and the US Constitution and that most fundamental of US civil rights, namely the fair access to the Courts of the land and the fair rule of law, in those Missouri Public Entities’ maintenance and enforcement I of an endemic system of disability discrimination against an entire class of people of the Brain-Injured Community and their families by association by means of providing no accommodation specifically to the needs and challenges of people living with Brain Injury due to their brain injuries, at any and all points of contact with the Missouri Judicial System? 5.) How can Federal Courts ignore the segregation upon segregation upon segregation of an entire class of people based on that people’s particular disability, namely Brain Injury and in the case of Robert Michael Goldberg, Anoxic Brain Injury, within Missouri and within American civil society therein as Missouri and other Missouri Public Entities’ maintenance and enforcement of an endemic system of disability discrimination against the BrainInjured Community and their families by association, and as relates to that most fundamental of US civil rights, namely fair access to the Courts of the land and the fair rule of law? 6.) When the State Judicial Systems and their Courts continue to shape and set medical policies, and blur the line of their jurisdiction, do they not then, effectively serve as Health Care Systems, that provide and deny health care, how can they not also be held accountable for their health care decisions as such organizations, in their turn, when those other Health Care Systems and organizations would be penalized for the same decisions when they are in transgression of Federal Laws? 7.) Is not the 224 Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, to which Robert Dierker was a member and an individual of, in the times of question of the Petitioner’s original civil motion, an association of individuals, and therefore a holder of rights, as Bush v. Gore holds, but like any individual, a holder of responsibilities and consequences of their actions from them as well, including transgressions such as freely violating Federal Law and the US Constitution?