Is there a distinction between the Public and Private in applying a federal government-funded Public Service, Title IV of the Social Security Act (Act), and Private Family Law terms?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED , Joe Blessett disagrees with the U.S. 5th Appellate Circuit Court's decision to affirm the District Court Judgment. Is there a distinction between the Public and Private in applying a federal government-funded Public Service, Title IV of the Social Security Act (Act), and Private Family Law terms? Was_ there Suppression of protected rights and federal statutes under the color of law that injured Blessett? Are Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Xavier Becerra following U.S. Congressional legislation of the Act as the U.S. Congress intended? 1. Are rights being denied because of the lower court's erroneous view of Public and Private law? 2. Are Blessett's 5th 10th and 14th Amendment rights being denied because of the suppression of unopposed evidence? 3. Are Federal penalties for the Act enforced without evidence of due process under 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(5)(H)? 4. Why can't Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw come under federal jurisdiction for knowing the continued color of law injury endured by Blessett because of enforcement of Title IV-D penalties without legal standing? 5. Why was Blessett denied using Ex parte Young against state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for federal jurisdiction to challenge state officials for . "failure to act" to prevent continued injuries? TT 6. Why was Contract Clause protection from state intrusion denied for Blessett's unopposed Private agreement with Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw? 7. Why were the Federal Rules of Evidence Rules 301 for Blessett's private agreement with "Notices, Notices of Acceptance, and Certificates of Nonresponse" to Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw denied? 8. Why did the lower courts not follow the U.S. Congress requirements for Xavier Becerra, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw to provide documentation required under 42 U.S.C. 666(a)(5)(H) for due process in the 2015 default judgments for the Act? 9. Did U.S. Congress stop requiring proof available . of reimbursement of Title IV-A funds under the statutory provisions of the Act? 10. Why did the lower courts ignore the relevant 2017 state court order assigning the outstanding support debt to a private entity and voiding the 2015 state court order under the operation of law transferring the outstanding support debt balance held by the public agency to a private firm? 11.Under what legal logic does a state court order made void or null under the operation of law fall under the Rooker Feldman Doctrine? 12.Did U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Congress intend for Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw to be able to show evidence of procedural TU due process to enforce Title IV-D federal public services penalties? 13. Did U.S. Congress spending clauses intend for Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw to be able to show evidence of due process with documentary evidence of judicial orders for collection and enforcement under the Act? 14. Did U.S. Congress intend for Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, and Steven C McCraw to be able to show evidence of an administrative hearing before the enforcement of penalties under the Act? 15.When did noncustodial parents lose their right to decline federal public service under the Act? 16. When did noncustodial parents lose their right to challenge federal agencies under the "Commerce Clause" in federal jurisdiction for the documentary evidence to enforce federal penalties (Federal Tax Offset)under the Act? 17.When did noncustodial parents lose their right to challenge the federal fiduciary actions in applying the Act and a private law firm? 18.Why did the lower courts ignore the difference between "public child support debt" under the public terms of a federal program versus "private child support debt" under private terms? 19. Why did the lower federal courts reject the due process evidence requirements for the U.S. Health , and Human Services debt certification compliance under the Act? IV 20.Why did the lower federal courts re