Have the Marshal service requirements of 9 U.S.C. § 9 on an application to confirm an arbitration award on a nonresident foreign adverse party been implicitly repealed?

Question Presented No. 1 is no, does 9 U.S.C. § 9 provide a viable method of service on a nonresident foreign adverse party outside of the U.S.? 3. If the answer to Question Presented No. 2 is no, is the appropriate fallback provision for service of an application to confirm an arbitration award on a nonresident foreign adverse party outside of the U.S., F.R.C.P. Rule 4 as followed in the Second Circuit, or F.R.C.P. Rule 5 (b) as followed in the Ninth Circuit? ii PARTIES TO PROCEEDING Pursuant to the Supreme Court Rule 14.1(b), the caption of the case contains the names of all the