civil-rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: Question One: Whether pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 65; Rules 22 and 23 of this Court; the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651; and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 705; Douglas County School District, hereinafter (““DCSD”); Jefferson County Public Schools, hereinafter (“Jeffco”); Colorado State Board of Education, hereinafter (“State Board”); Colorado Department of Education, hereinafter (“CDE”); CDE Commissioner Susana Cordova; and Sterling Ranch Development Corp., hereinafter (“Sterling Ranch”) are enjoined and prohibited through preliminary injunction filed on 4/18/2024, in Colorado Supreme Court Case Number 248C181 and Denver District Court Case Number 2023CV610, from consummating and/or approving any : ' and all new Colorado charter schools, pending final judgment by jury trial for Denver District Court Case 2023CV610, Colorado Court of Appeals 2024CA138, Colorado Supreme Court 20248C181, and U.S. Supreme Court Emergency Writ of Injunction 23A1007 denied by ; Justice Neil M. Gorsuch on 5/21/2024, submitted to Justice Clarence Thomas, on 5/22/2024, and DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024, and filed for review in this Supreme Court Petition for Writ of Certiorari, because of (1) irreparable injury in the absence of such an order; (2) that the threatened injury to the moving party outweighs the harm to the opposing party resulting from the order; (3) that the injunction is not adverse to public interest; and (4) that the moving party has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. ua Question Two: Whether the Colorado Revised Statutes C.R.S. § 22-80.5-1088)(d) — “The decision of the State Board of Education shall be final” and not subject : ; to Judicial Review. Question Three: Whether Emergency Writ of Injunction Respondents DCSD, Jeffco, State Board, CDE, and Sterling Ranch, et al. have created an Unconstitutional lawless Monopoly and are illegally allowed to deny and thwart the creation of Petitioners’ 17 charter schools : in 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2023; her third-party employment; and building and land ownership, which caused an unsafe learning environment and severe safety breach that resulted in the May 7, 2019, STEM School Highlands Ranch, hereinafter (“STEM School”) shooting and tragic murder, an event of Mass Destruction and Domestic Terrorism as defined by F\B.L., (https:// because they secretly and non-transparently executed, covered up, and failed to investigate the following Unconstitutional Federal crimes, antitrust violations, and employment : discrimination: 1. Federal Antitrust Enforcement Enacted in 1890, the Sherman Act : 2.18 U.S. Code § 2331(5) Domestic Terrorism 8. Federal Whistle Blower Protection Act 4,18 U.S.C. § 873 Blackmail and extortion laws 5. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 2022 ; 6. 18 U.S. Code § 201 Bribery of Public Officials and : Witnesses 2022 : 7.18 U.S.C. § 1349 Attempt and Conspiracy . i : : 8. Harassment — Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 . : 9. Third-party Interference . . 10. 18 U.S.C. § 471 Forgery ; ; : 11. 18 U.S.C. §§$§ 1503, 1512, 1513 Obstruction Of Justice ; 12, Libel Per Se/Libel Per Quod 13. 10 U.S. Code § 919b Art. 119b. Child Endangerment 14. 18 U.S.C. § 371 —Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to : Defraud the United States Question Four: Whether pursuant to the U.S. EEOC Policy Statement on Control by Third Parties over the Employment Relationship Between an Individual and : ; His/Her Direct Employer, EEOC Dec. 87-2, 16869 (CCH) / (1987), the Colorado Civil Rights Division, hereinafter (“CCRD”) has jurisdiction over this charter school thirdparty employment discrimination appeal. https://www. , eeoc. : iv , Question Five: Whether the STEM School shall be returned to Petitioner’s leadership because DCSD, STEM, . ‘CCRD, et al. breached/forged their contract. In 2014, 2017, 2018 and 2019, and 2023, third-party employers DCSD, and in 2014 and 20