Whether Charles fails to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions are presented in the order stated in the Federal Seventh Circuit Appeals Court Order affirming the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Order of Dismissal with Prejudice as follows: 1. Whether Charles fails to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted? (pg. 1 par. 1) 2. Whether the Court erroneously concludes Charles case or any portion of it lacks subject matter jurisdiction and is thus barred under the RookerFeldman Doctrine? (pg. 1 and 2, par. 1) 3. Whether the Court erroneously concludes that Charles is not the real party of interest and therefore lacks standing in this civil matter? (pg. 2 par. 2) 4. Whether the ongoing claims in Charles’ Complaint are filed within the proper statute of limitations time frame under F.R.C.P. 8(a) and 9(b) (pg. 2 par. 2) : 5. Whether any Federal (State if applicable) Law allows Charles a private right of action awarded thru a Federal Court due to lack of existing law. 2 par. 3) 6. Whether as stated by the U.S. Seventh Circuit Appeal court the pursuit of justice is “futile” in this matter and Charles Complaint being dismissed with prejudice by the Federal District Court and confirmed is a violation of her constitutionally guaranteed civil right to due process and trial by jury? (pg. 2 par. 3)