Ade Olumide v. Minnesota, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment FirstAmendment Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Question not identified.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Article IV s4, Article VI s2, Ist, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendments refer to the U.S. Constitution. / | Question 1: Do incite harm tests for the US Supreme Court show that Article IV s4, 1st, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendment “due process” include press freedom to search identified or de-identified police complaint tribunals records and report on decisions that incite police misconduct through a lack of mandatory decertification of “sufficiently imminent and substantial” “risk of harm” to “life, liberty, or : : property"? : Question 2: Is open court civil derived from 1: Amendment press freedom, Article IV s4 open | government, 5th 14th Amendment due process? Does ; open court apply to police complaint adjudication? Question 3: Do 1s: Amendment press freedom rights to ; ; report on public interest matters, include open court : access to police complaint adjudication records? Question 4: Are de-identified police complaints transparency, an irreducible constitutional minimum? Question 5: Are Minnesota Statutes s13D.01 §Subd. 2. Exceptions (2) “when it is exercising quasi-judicial ii functions involving disciplinary proceedings ... Subd. 5 Public access ... Subd. 6 Public copy”; sec.13.43 §Subd.2 (a)(8b) “disciplinary action does not become public data if ... sustains a grievance”; exclusion of non disciplinary records from sec.13.43 §Subd.2 “Public data” (a)(5) “disciplinary action”; an overbroad violation of Article IV s4, 1st, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendments? Question 6: Is the appealed July 13 order, causation . for Independent Evaluator, Community Oversight Committee, Review Panel, Police Chief, Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis, Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota Statutes 363A.14 "aid, abet, incite, compel", 42 U.S. Code §1983 color of statute deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution (Article IV s.4, Article V s.2, 15 4th 5th 14th . Amendments)? Question 7: But for redactions like court publication bans; is there an Article IV s4, 1s* Amendment open : court media right to a searchable online database of the police complaint records before the adjudicator? LIST OF ALL PARTIES State of Minnesota by Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner ; of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, Respondent, City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Y iii Police Officers Federation of Minneapolis, Respondent, Minnesota Coalition on Government Information, . Respondent, ; Communities United Against Police Brutality, Respondent, Ade Olumide, Petitioner. .