No. 23-1309
Karnail Singh v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: breach-of-plea-agreement coram-nobis corum-nobis due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement relief sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of corum nobis relief was erroneous given that Petitioner suffered ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the denial of corum nobis relief was erroneous given that Petitioner suffered ineffective assistance of counsel. Whether the facts constitute a clear breach of the plea agreement and violation of due process.
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-21
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-06-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-06-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Karnail Singh
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent