No. 23-132
Cynthia L. Pollick v. Anthony P. Trozzolillo
Response Waived
Tags: attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights debtors-prison due-process equal-protection imprisonment statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether imprisoning a citizen for a divorce judgment of attorney fees violated 28 U.S.C. § 2007(a) since a citizen cannot be imprisoned for a money judgment in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether imprisoning a citizen for a divorce judgment of attorney fees violated 28 U.S.C. § 2007(a) since a citizen cannot be imprisoned for a money judgment in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Whether this Court has abolished debtors’ prison. Whether the state appellate process must provide due process and equal protection to its citizens. | | | | ii
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent Anthony P. Trozzolillo to respond filed.
2023-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2023)
Attorneys
Anthony P. Trozzolillo
Johanna L. Gelb — Gelb Law Firm, Respondent
Johanna L. Gelb — Gelb Law Firm, Respondent