Whether a plaintiff relying on a disparate-impact theory of liability under the Fair Housing Act carries her prima facie burden by showing only a preexisting statistical disparity within the affected population that the defendant did not create

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a plaintiff relying on a disparateimpact theory of liability under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seqg., carries her prima facie burden by showing only a preexisting statistical disparity within the affected population that the defendant did not create. 2. Whether a defendant carries its burden to rebut such a case by showing that the challenged policy significantly serves a legitimate business purpose, or instead must further show that the policy is necessary to serve that purpose.