Whether a Bivens action can be maintained against federal agents and actors when a search warrant is obtained in violation of the doctrine established in Frank v. Delaware, and the search and seizure warrant requirement under circumstances not significantly different from those recognized under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER A _ BIVENS ACTION BE MAINTAINED AGAINST FEDERAL AGENTS AND ACTORS WHEN A SEARCH WARRANT IS OBTAINED IN VIOLATION OF THE DOCTRINE ESTABLISHED IN FRANK V. DELAWARE, AND THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE WARRANT REQUIREMENT UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE RECOGNIZED UNDER BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FED. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)? ll. WHETHER CORPORATIONS HAVE FOURTH AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS THAT ALLOW THEM TO BRING A BIVENS ACTION AGAINST FEDERAL AGENTS AND ACTORS, SEEKING DETERMINATIONS OF LIABILITIES AND MONETARY DAMAGES, UNDER’ THE DOCTRINE OF BIVENS V. SIX UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF FED. BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), AS A PLAINTIFF IN A TRIAL BY JURY? I. WHETHER THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT COMPELS FEDERAL COURTS OPERATING UNDER FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1331 TO DECIDE CONSTITUTIONAL TORT CLAIMS BASED ON COMMON LAW, EVEN IF THERE u ARE NO STATUTORY OR COURTCREATED REMEDIES FOR MONETARY DAMAGES UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF CASES AND CONTROVERSY PLEADING STANDARDS?