No. 23-1350

Robert Korman, et al. v. Superior Court of California, City and County of San Francisco, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure court-order due-process extrajudicial-evidence judicial-bias judicial-bias-and-prejudice judicial-disqualification judicial-ethics legal-procedure recusal
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether proof of a judge's commission of bias and prejudice against a litigant in a case alone mandates his immediate disqualification and reversal of all of his orders without the need for any additional proof from an extrajudicial source

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether proof of a judge’s commission of bias and prejudice against a litigant in a case alone mandates his immediate disqualification and reversal of all of his orders without the need for any additional proof from an extrajudicial source. PARTIES TO PROCEEDING The parties to this proceeding are Petitioners Robert Korman and his wife Nancy Ryti, California Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal First Appellate District, San Francisco Superior Court and real party in interest Charles Adam Nunziato. i

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-03-12

Attorneys

Robert Korman, et al.
Robert Korman — Petitioner
Robert Korman — Petitioner